UV Retainer Cleaners and Cases, Claim by Claim
Kill rates shown only as the makers' quoted claims.
The claims, belowGeneral information, not dental advice. Your orthodontist's instructions come first.
Holiday season 2026: the cleaner guides are fresh
Whose kill rate is on the box, and how the FDA classes these devices.

Kill rates shown only as the makers' quoted claims.
The claims, belowPlanned pages are marked.
A one-button pod against a cordless UV-C unit.
Top listOne list across the three ways to clean a tray.
UV chamber disinfection devices, 21 CFR 880.6600 FDA
Sonic Dental cites its own lab reports Sonic Dental
Zima argues UV is less effective in cloudy water and sells a separate UV case Zima
The AAO's routine is a daily brush and a weekly soak; its page does not mention UV AAO
Their words, not ours.
"UV-C light kills 99.9% of bacteria, viruses & pathogens."Sonic Dental, based on its own testing.
"The Odyssey is a cleaner and will kill 99.9% of bacteria and pathogens."Sonic Dental, citing its own lab reports.
Makers say so: Sonic Dental says its UV-C light 'kills 99.9% of bacteria, viruses & pathogens', based on its own testing. We print such figures only as the maker's words. The FDA classes UV radiation chamber disinfection devices as Class II (21 CFR 880.6600).
An ultrasonic cleaner uses sound waves in water to loosen buildup, as its makers describe it; a UV-C chamber shines ultraviolet light. Some units, such as the Sonic Odyssey and Sonic Pro, do both, per Sonic Dental. Zima argues UV is less effective in cloudy water.
Zima argues UV light is less effective in cloudy water. It leaves UV off its Dental Pods and sells a separate UV case.